Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.95% 85.92% -1.04%
==========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 138 135 -3
==========================================
- Hits 120 116 -4
- Misses 18 19 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
not sure why windows builds are failing, probably is related to a thing not related to this PR 🤔 |
|
Thanks for contributing! At the moment this DLGTM. Before doing this though, I need to improve the CI and find a way to test on more OS than we currently do (maybe using a mixure of vagrant and docker, suggestions welcome). |
|
@simonepri I agree, right now CI build is a problem. What if we delay this to be shipped under Then both things could be done: If you need to use Node 10 or lower, use 0.x, otherwise 1.x is for you. |
|
Yes that's exactly the plan! The PR per se looks good, it is just that some other work needs to be done before this can be merged. |
|
@simonepri I have merged the #14 because that improvement will not breaking anything. However, the Node version 4/6 are removed from the CI testing by that PR. FYI. |
f053814 to
d3fb048
Compare
|
Applied suggestions. Can you take care about this PR? It's open for more than one year. |
huan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for continue improving this PR!
Could you please bump the minor version to the next one (0.6.0 -> 0.7.0) so that we can make this change not affect the previous version users?
|
I prefer to don't bump numbers in a PR; That's a thing can be done after merge the PR. It looks like nobody has the ability to move this forward, so pinging @simonepri |
|
For some reason your PR has remained open without being merged or rejected. In the meantime Node.js versions have moved on.
|
|
closing since authors are not interested |
The main point of this PR is
String.prototype.startsWith) since is not more necessaryutil.promisify